At the Ruffed Grouse Society & American Woodcock Society (RGS & AWS), we believe in the transformative power of actively managed forests—for wildlife, for hunters and for future generations. That’s why we’re proud to announce our role as a key partner in an amicus brief supporting the U.S. Forest Service’s management plans for the White Mountain National Forest (WMNF). This initiative underscores our unwavering commitment to science-based forest management and habitat conservation.
The amicus brief, spearheaded by the Society for the Protection of New Hampshire Forests, brings together a diverse coalition of like-minded organizations. Partners include the Appalachian Mountain Club, Northern Forest Center, The Nature Conservancy, New Hampshire Audubon, the Society of American Foresters’ Granite State Division and more. Each partner shares a commitment to sustainable forest stewardship that balances ecological health, public engagement and the economic vitality of local communities.
This collaborative effort responds to a legal challenge that threatens to restrict the ability of the Forest Service to carry out timber harvests—actions that have been meticulously planned through a public process. These harvests aren’t random; they’re part of a long-term strategy to enhance forest diversity and resilience, benefiting ruffed grouse, American woodcock and a suite of other wildlife species that thrive in young forests.
Why did we step forward? Because the stakes are high. Limiting active forest management undermines the progress we’ve made in advocating for forests that sustain diverse habitats. The WMNF is not only a natural treasure but also a living example of how thoughtful silviculture can create forests that are healthier, more resilient and teeming with life.
Our participation in this legal effort aligns directly with our mission. At RGS & AWS, we champion working forests that are alive with birdsong and brimming with opportunities for upland bird hunters. Supporting the Forest Service’s plans is about more than a single decision; it’s about preserving the ability of land managers to implement sound practices that safeguard our forest heritage.
This is a call to action for all who value the hunting tradition, the thrill of a flushing grouse and the integrity of our forests. Together, we’re ensuring that the next generation will inherit not just a landscape to marvel at, but a legacy to uphold.
For the love of forests and the upland birds we cherish,
The Northeast RGS & AWS Team
Join RGS & AWS in Supporting Science-Based Forestry and Habitat Management in New Hampshire
Join RGS & AWS today and let your voice be heard. Your voice matters in preserving the balance of our national forests. Together, we can ensure a thriving future for wildlife and forest ecosystems.
Frequently Asked Questions:
What is the White Mountain National Forest (WMNF), and why is it important?
The WMNF spans almost 800,000 acres in New Hampshire and Maine and is one of only two national forests in New England, offering multiple benefits like wildlife habitat, recreation, timber production and carbon sequestration. Its management reflects the “multiple use” principle, ensuring that it serves diverse needs sustainably while preserving its natural beauty.
What are the two timber projects being litigated?
A lawsuit, seeking injunctive relief, was filed in May 2024 in the United States District Court, New Hampshire, by the environmental group Standing Trees. This litigation seeks to stop the Tarleton Integrated Resource Project and Peabody West Integrated Resource Project from moving forward, alleging that the Forest Service bypassed the public input process in coming to their decision. Tarleton and Peabody West are multiple use forest management projects located in the Pemigewasset and Androscoggin Ranger Districts. Silvicultural treatments for the two projects total less than 3,000 acres, or 0.375% of the total national forest area. WMNF began the public planning and scoping process for the Peabody West Integrated Resource Project in December 2019 and the public comment period was initiated in August 2022. An objection period started in April 2023, and the Forest Service’s decision was made in February 2024. The public comment period for Tarleton began in July 2021 and a two-year planning process ensued before a decision was reached by the Forest Service in November 2023. This public input was considered by the Forest Service as they developed the plans to align with the 2005 WMNF Land and Resource Management Plan “The Forest Plan.”
Why is RGS & AWS involved in this amicus brief?
Science-based forest management on our public lands is central to RGS & AWS’s mission of promoting young forests that sustain ruffed grouse, American woodcock and other wildlife. By joining the amicus brief, RGS supports sustainable forestry practices on WMNF that improve forest health and biodiversity while balancing ecological and human values.
Who are the coalition partners supporting the amicus brief?
Partners include the Society for the Protection of New Hampshire Forests, Appalachian Mountain Club, The Nature Conservancy, Northern Forest Center, New Hampshire Audubon, New Hampshire Timberland Owners Association, New England Society of American Foresters and others. Each organization has a unique mission and role in its commitments to healthy forests, open space and connecting New Englanders to nature.
What are the main arguments in favor of the U.S. Forest Service’s management plans?
The WMNF Management Plan, including the Tarleton and Peabody West integrated resource management projects, are the result of extensive public input and balance diverse uses, from recreation to open space to timber harvesting. The planned projects fulfill the goals of the forest plan, which promotes healthy ecosystems, wildlife habitat and sustainable forest products. Restricting these efforts undermines forest health and resiliency.
How does this effort align with RGS & AWS’s mission?
RGS & AWS advocate for diverse, resilient forests that support upland bird species. By defending the U.S. Forest Service’s ability to manage public forests, we ensure the continuation of practices that foster the habitats crucial for grouse, woodcock and other wildlife.
What happens next?
The court will review the amicus brief and the arguments from all sides. Meanwhile, RGS & AWS will continue advocating for science-based forest management and educating our members and the public at large about the importance of public land stewardship. Members can stay engaged by supporting our advocacy efforts and spreading awareness of the benefits of sustainable forestry.